home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT2344>
- <title>
- Jan. 11, 1993: How Conservatism Can Come Back
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Jan. 18, 1993 Fighting Back: Spouse Abuse
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ESSAY, Page 68
- How Conservatism Can Come Back
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Charles Krauthammer
- </p>
- <p> In the late '40s, American liberalism made a fateful
- decision: it went into the business of excommunication.
- Liberalism's leading lights--figures like Joseph Rauh, Walter
- Reuther and Hubert Humphrey--understood that unless they
- clearly separated themselves from communists and their fellow
- travelers they risked losing not just their souls but their
- political viability. Hence Principle 6 of the founding statement
- of Americans for Democratic Action: "We reject any association
- with Communists or sympathizers with communism."
- </p>
- <p> In America, political movements need to police their
- extremes. Conservatism is no exception. It is a matter not just
- of principle, but of practical politics. Unless conservatism is
- prepared to divorce itself from its extremists, it will suffer
- the taint. As it suffered in 1964 when Barry Goldwater declared
- famously that "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice."
- That welcoming nod to the John Birchers and other right-wing
- nuts convinced millions of Americans that Goldwater and his
- party were not fit to govern.
- </p>
- <p> Later that decade, radicals of the New Left adopted the
- slogan "No enemies on the left," welcoming every loony Maoist
- and Trotskyite in the common struggle against the "system."
- Among the New Left's many political mistakes, this refusal to
- divorce extremists may have been the worst.
- </p>
- <p> In politics it is as important to define what you are not
- as it is to define what you are. This is especially true in a
- country as congenitally moderate as the U.S. Take the campaign
- of 1992. Polling data show that Americans are more attuned to
- conservative positions on major issues, such as taxes,
- government intervention, "family values," etc. Bill Clinton
- understood the nation's mood and ran as a middle-of-the-road
- "New Democrat." That is why for keynote speaker at the
- Democratic Convention, he chose not Jesse Jackson but moderates
- like Bill Bradley and Barbara Jordan.
- </p>
- <p> At their convention the Republicans did precisely the
- opposite. They showcased their extremes. On opening night they
- had the chance to present the most popular Republican in 50
- years, creator of a whole class of political converts known as
- Reagan Democrats. What did they do? They had Ronald Reagan speak
- near midnight, when most of America was fast asleep. Who got the
- prime 9 o'clock spot? Pat Buchanan with his promise of
- "religious war." Reagan ended his speech with his "shining city
- upon a hill" peroration, a vision of the sunny uplands of
- America's future. Buchanan ended his speech too with a vision
- of America at its best: a couple of soldiers pointing M-16s at
- a mob of fellow (presumably black and Hispanic) Americans.
- </p>
- <p> Now, riot control--Buchanan's image was drawn from the
- Los Angeles riots--is a necessary function of government. But
- for most Americans it is not the apotheosis of the American
- Dream. It is the apotheosis of the police state.
- </p>
- <p> Admittedly, drawing a bright line of exclusion on the
- right is not as easy as it once was to draw it on the left. The
- left had an entrenched political party (Communist) and clear
- foreign enemy (the Soviet Union), association with which was a
- prima facie reason for excommunication. But the task of the
- right is not impossible. In the '50s and '60s, William F.
- Buckley led a heroic and successful effort to purge conservatism
- of its anti-Semitic and neofascist elements. More recently, the
- Republican Party excommunicated David Duke.
- </p>
- <p> But the Duke case is easy. Only a few years ago, the man
- was selling Mein Kampf from his legislative office. The hard
- case is Buchanan. An affable and engaging man, a man of proven
- political courage and loyalty, he has taken to trafficking in
- nativism, authoritarianism, isolationism and anti-Semitism. The
- narrow and angry conservatism that Buchanan represents does not
- just violate the optimistic, expansive spirit of Reaganism. It
- is the surest ticket back to the intellectual and political
- marginality in which conservatism languished before Buckley
- began cleaning up the movement four decades ago.
- </p>
- <p> The Republican Party has no hope of regaining power and
- attracting conservative Democrats or moderate Republicans unless
- it draws a bright line. Family values, for example, is a
- perfectly legitimate issue and by any measure a winning one. Yet
- in 1992 it was driven into the ground by the aggressive,
- intolerant way it was presented at the Houston convention.
- </p>
- <p> Americans are desperately concerned about the corrupting
- effects of the mass culture on their children. They are rightly
- aroused by grade school curriculums that present homosexuality
- as just another life-style choice. They know instinctively that
- single parenthood, for all the heroism it summons from women,
- is the surest path to childhood poverty. They want to rebuild
- "family values"--but they refuse to see the rebuilding as an
- act of religious war. And when they hear their concerns
- transmuted into appeals to intolerance, they tune out.
- </p>
- <p> They tuned out in November, and not just because the
- economy was bad. Reagan Democrats and suburban Republicans found
- it hard to vote for the party of Houston. The basic challenge
- for conservatism as it tries to rebuild is recognizing that its
- weakness is not what it is for--most Americans are generally
- for the same things--but refusing to define what it is
- against. Traditional values, not a "Christian nation." Racial
- color blindness, not racial intolerance. A city on a hill, not
- an armed camp. Conservatism, not reaction.
- </p>
- <p> Until it rejects the far right, conservatism will not
- regain the center. And without the center, it cannot win.
- </p>
-
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-